Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2026

Abstract

This article provides an account of how John Carroll University redesigned the role of writing in its core curriculum to embed rhetorical pedagogy across all four years of a student’s academic career. Rather than viewing general education changes as a bureaucratic hurdle, this study demonstrates how writing program administrators can align an institution’s local identity, in this case the Jesuit traditions of purposeful communication (eloquentia perfecta) and holistic care (cura personalis), with contemporary writing stud- ies research to inspire cross-disciplinary faculty ownership. Moving beyond a basic description of requirements, I present a narrative of rhetorical advo- cacy that operates across three distinct curricular tiers. Driven by ongoing, faculty-led assessment cycles that treat data as a tool for pedagogical growth rather than mere compliance, this essay illustrates how the university systematically redesigned the role of writing within foundational, integrated, and major-level courses. This narrative, supported by cross-disciplinary rubrics and institutional frameworks in the appendices, offers a sustainable roadmap to help other program directors navigate institutional friction and build lasting writing cultures on their own campuses.

Share

COinS