Document Type
Article
Abstract
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned the access to abortion that had been established with Roe v Wade. As a result, states had autonomy to make statewide policies on this issue. Some states chose complete bans, some partial bans, and others provided continuing access to abortion. This article explores the dueling referenda of 2022 and 2023 in Kentucky and Ohio, respectively, following the Dobbs decision in 2022. Voters in both states voted to continue to permit abortion access in their states, yet access in each state is different. Using case studies, we examine the political nuances and electoral aftermath of these referenda, and find a dichotomy behind how electoral decisions have influenced policy at the state level based on party control and political leadership.
Recommended Citation
Reilly, Shauna; Boggs, Ainsley; and Freeman, Tanner
(2025)
"A Tale of Two States: Abortion Referenda in the Aftermath of Dobbs,"
The Journal of Economics and Politics: Vol. 29:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59604/1046-2309.1194
Available at:
https://collected.jcu.edu/jep/vol29/iss1/4